An underlying fact in the American workplace is the shortage of qualified workers available to fill jobs. The principal business challenge of recruiting, retraining and inspiring talent continues, even in a slumping economy - just like in good times - as employees retire, quit, are terminated, find a new job, enroll in school or move away.
With layoffs the remedy for economic ills, it is often mistakenly thought that hiring is linked to economic growth. Statistically; however, economic growth makes up only about 5% of overall hiring actions in the U.S. Turnover is the overwhelming and primary reason for the majority of a company’s need to hire.
When headcount is monitored closely and managers must “made do” with less people, poorer performers are less tolerated and are “performance managed” out. As such, managers look for top performers from outside the company to ensure their teams are able to perform at high levels in challenging times.
At the same time, in a weak economy, top performers seek out opportunities they perceive as recession-proof causing employers to compete against rival employers.
Under a hiring freeze, overall headcount is targeted to remain at an established number. In these circumstances, when an employee leaves, managers still must make “backfill” hires to cover key positions.
After a period of reactionary cutting and freezing, hiring activity will return to a level of normalcy, business as usual. Then, employers will find that that they are lacking talent in a competitive job market—the market for “employed” top performers.
During times like this, employers will be flooded with candidates from which to choose. A nice change…or not? Hiring managers are well advised to proceed with caution as you contemplate hiring from the pool of available “active” candidates—recently available due to layoffs. Likely, these candidates are “first wavers” who in a robust economy “flew under the radar” and now find themselves “redundant” in an economy that requires top talent to produce results. This doesn’t mean all unemployed or job-seeking candidates are bad or mediocre, but for many, it is indeed the fact.
As the numbers of candidates on the market increases it becomes increasingly difficult to “separate the wheat from the chaffe” and choose the people that are of high quality from a group of mixed quality.
Does it make sense then to continue to employ the services of a search firm to find talent for your organization? Consider that a professional executive search firm is in constant contact with candidates and hiring managers across the segments in which they specialize. This “constant contact” is with “passive” candidates who, when facing economic instability, are more likely to entertain a new opportunity if presented by a known, trusted advisor.
The bottom line…great people are hard to find in even the best “employer's market” circumstances, and only great people are a good investment when resources are dear. An investment in a search fee pays dividends when a new employee not only joins your organization, but contributes with the high level of skill, talent and character commonly found with employed, “passive” candidates who “fly under your radar.”
Direct Search Alliance is exclusively a direct recruiting firm, targeting passive candidates (we do not use ads or postings of any kind; we source top talent directly by researching the market and reaching out to working processionals to develop relationships and share connections). We are the Staffing Industry’s best resource, with multidisciplinary depth and breadth across Commercial and Professional segments, to source a top performer for your organization in 2009.
