Direct Search Alliance is a Search and Talent Consultancy established by Staffing Industry leaders to provide an alliance between America's best employers and executive, management and professional people. The focal point of our business is directly recruiting for candidates and developing relationships to continually build a network of experienced professionals with connections inside the top employers to work for.
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Four Lessons We Should Have Learned This Year
Adversity is a great teacher, and the past year will certainly be one of the most adverse and professionally difficult that we will ever experience.
It has been a year of paradoxes and contradictions: unemployment is soaring, but many organizations cannot find the qualified people they need. Rather than restructure work or rethink how work gets done in order to find people, we continue to seek people to work in traditional ways. More people are looking for part-time, temporary, or contract work, yet only a tiny percentage of companies are looking for these type of people. We know that being discourteous to people creates negative branding and is morally questionable especially when so many are unemployed, but we have perhaps never been as discourteous to applicants are we are now. Energy costs have fluctuated wildly and global warming is a topic on every agenda, yet most organizations and people prefer face-to-face relationships rather than asking people to save energy by working from home.
Here are four lessons we should have learned this year.
Lesson #1: Building and maintaining candidate relationships and generating referrals are keys to survival.
Job descriptions should be dead, but I have no doubt that they will live on for a long time. We should all agree that they are not the best, cheapest, or fastest way to attract good people.
In general, you are not going to find the people you need by posting on job boards. The most successful recruiters use social networks, ask employees (and others) for referrals and focus on building talent communities of potential candidates.
Learn from product and service marketing how to do a better job. Watch how IBM or Deloitte advertise and market their professional services. Go for targeted messaging and quality, not volume. Generate candidates from relationships you form using tools such as LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter and by asking for referrals. Make it a rule of thumb that if you are generating hundreds of responses to a job posting, you are doing something terribly wrong.
Lesson #2: Use targeted, bold marketing and branding to appeal to the types of candidates you want.
Don’t try to appeal to everyone. Focus your marketing messages and media on the type of candidate you are most in need of. KPMG and other organizations target college-age candidates with videos and other media designed to appeal to that age group and to the personalities of the type of candidates who usually want to work for them.
They don’t spend any time or money on marketing that is generic or that appeals to older potential candidates.
The best marketing is always targeted to a specific audience and discourages, although subtly, those who don’t fit the target. Partly this is done through words and pictures and partly by placing the information where the people you are targeting are most likely to see it.
For example, Mercedes advertises on television at the times and on programs where their research shows that highly successful and well off people watch. They place print advertisements in magazines that these types of people read. They do not advertise on Super Bowl nor do they advertise in Reader’s Digest. Targeted marketing requires research, focus, carefully thought-out graphics, and tested writing.
Wording is also key; what you say makes all the difference. If you say and imply that you are seeking only those with very specific backgrounds and qualifications, you will reduce the numbers who apply and improve quality. Even your recruiting web site needs to be worded in a way that is attractive to those you are most anxious to have apply. Cisco Systems has a web site that is appealing to technical professionals but less so to others.
Lesson #3: Do not just use, but embrace, emerging technology
Social networks, video, YouTube, candidate relationship management products, Web 3.0 websites, and SecondLife are all tools that can potentially enlarge your candidate pools, screen candidates, and build relationships.
Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube are perhaps the most effective recruiting tools in your arsenal. Video has become king in attracting people, and YouTube is the second-most used search engine after Google itself. If your organization has a recruiting page and/or video, it’s a good start.
Once you start attracting potential candidates, there are many tools to help screen them and communicate with them. CRM tools (Avature is a good example) let you track and communicate with groups of candidates. The most current ATS vendors are also offering this capability and even allow you to link to online profiles in LinkedIn and Facebook. This means candidates do not need a resume.
There are countless email programs, newsletter distribution programs, and other free or inexpensive communication aids that recruiters can use to do a better job letting candidates know where they stand. Even automatic bounce-back responses can be more intelligently written and distributed. A follow-up email could follow the bounce-back and automatically provide the candidate with another touch point.
Lesson #4: Accept change as a way of life
We will not be heading back to the more traditional ways of recruiting, and the contradictions and paradoxes I outlined at the beginning of this article will be with us for a long time. Traditional recruiting skills will be liabilities and will generate little profit.
Everything from face-to-face interviews to onboarding new employees will be more automated and will be done using the Internet. Software applications and mobile technology will dominate the recruiting space. Video interviewing and simulations for selection will become normal within five years.
To be a thriving recruiter you need to focus on building a new mindset that is centered on the acceptance of change as a constant and on taking advantage of technology.
Perhaps the greatest lesson of this year is that we are now at the place where we can use this technology to target our marketing, focus on a smaller number of candidates, allow more direct communication between candidates and hiring managers, and spend more time on raising awareness and marketing key positions using the various technical platforms we have available.
The ability to do this will be seen as strength and will generate returning profit for years to come.
Sunday, November 1, 2009
US staffing market primed for recovery
In a live satellite link up to California at APSCo’s member sales conference in London, Mester told delegates that the value of the world’s largest staffing market (on a country-by-country basis) has now fallen to $93bn (£58.5bn), from $126bn in 2008.
But total revenue is predicted to grow to $98bn next year and temporary staffing is forecast to grow in all sectors measured by the research firm, including industrial (15%), finance/accounting (8%), IT (8%), marketing/creative (5%), legal (5%), clinical/scientific (4%), engineering/design (4%), office/clerical (4%) and healthcare (1%).
According to Mester, US recruiters have been more agile in the recession, increasing their value-adds of recruitment process outsourcing, HR outsourcing, managed service provider services, vendor managed services and master supplier services, while there were 8% more staffing companies placing professionals over office staff and industrial staff last year than in 2004.
Mester said: “Over the next 10 years, employment services will be one of the biggest growth industries. Increasingly, there are more people that want to work in flexible arrangements. Management teams are looking for more flexible workforces and there are skill shortages in professional skill sets.”
But elsewhere, Palmer Forecast predicts that US temporary worker demand is set to fall by 13.7% in 2009.
The industry consulting firm’s findings indicated a 22.2% decline in temporary help for Q3 2009, which actually came in at a 24.5 % decline more than predicted due to higher than expected unemployment figures.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, seasonally adjusted temp jobs fell 23.3% year-over-year in September, up from the 24.5% year-over-year decline in August. Temp jobs, seasonally adjusted, fell slightly, 0.1% sequentially from August.
Palmer says this is an encouraging early sign of rebound and provided a 3.1% boost on a non-seasonally adjusted basis. The 2,000 temp job losses were the lowest rate of loss since October 2007.
The unemployment rate increased to 9.8% in September from 9.7% in August, the highest jobless rate since June 1983.
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Celebrating 2-Years of Bringing People Together!
Leveraging best-in-class database management and communications technology, as well as the rapid growth of premier business information search engines and businesses-oriented social networking websites, we have built the largest confidential network of Staffing and Human Capital Industry professionals in North America.
How we provide this new standard is centered on making new and sustaining valued relationships with working professionals day after day. We might leverage "information technology" to create a platform from which we work, but what makes our approach truly unique to the industry is in our collective efforts to reach out to top performers directly by phone or with personal correspondence to develop relationships over time with industry talent, both broadly coast-to-coast and deeply within local markets.
We bypass the typical employment sites and find people who aren't looking for a job, but are interested in hearing about new opportunities and welcome a career partner with connections inside the top employers to work for.
In the Staffing & Human Capital Services Industry, we have multidisciplinary depth and breadth across Commercial and Professional Staffing, Place & Search, Outplacement, Human Capital Management Services and Outsourcing segments.
Our organizational mission is to represent, serve and inspire talented individuals in connection with business performance as well as career progression. We believe that it is people who drive business success, and it is our job to bring people together.
Join us in celebrating our anniversary. Cheers to our team: Leslie, Kisa, Craig, Lisa, Carrie, Jen, and Amy! A heartfelt thank you to our clients who have supported our growth with exciting and challenging opportunities, and sincere appreciation to our candidates who have brought us diverse skills and talents, making us proud and more knowledgeable.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
Physician, heal thyself
A pithy saying, a bit dated for these modern times, but spot on with what ills the Staffing Industry.
What the industry sells to business clients is flexibility and access to talent; responsiveness and quality, as well as specialization and depth in any one industry or discipline. With economic times uncertain, the need for flexibility and talent is more acute, a message Staffing Industry companies are quick to point out to customers who have cut back on spending on staffing and talent searches.
Staffing Industry leaders; however, espouse the benefits of industry services staffing firms bring to the economy, while at the same time have cut back or eliminated the use of "in-house" temporary employees and put a freeze on using outside search firms to find them talent specific to their industry segment. Hmm...what is wrong with this picture?
Another proverb says it best...charity begins at home. You should take care of family and people close to you before you worry about helping others. For customers and the industry analysts to have confidence in the industry as a whole, we must set the example to validate what we sell is truly of value to businesses--even in difficult economic times.
As the premier source of top talent to the Staffing and Human Capital Services Industries, I have the pleasure of working with companies who value talent and trust us to be the specialist practice we are to provide talent for sales, recruiting, client services, management and executive positions. We do, however, come across companies that have shut down the use of the very services that they sell.
In my opinion, this is a factor germane to the success or failure of the industry to recover. Be a part of the solution to our fiscal challenges and use Staffing Industry services, benefit from the flexibility and the access to talent that are central to growth and prosperity.
With talent, we can help.
Monday, March 23, 2009
Win Friends and Expand Your Network
Do you freeze when someone invites you to a networking event? Do you groan at the mere mention of the word networking?
Networking isn't about artificial settings or immediately asking someone at a professional event for a job. Rather, in the truest sense of the word, networking is about friendship and communication.
Your family, friends, and neighbors, and current and former coworkers are all part of your natural network. So is everyone you stay in contact with and show an interest in.
Reach Out and Touch Everyone
To have a friend, you must be a friend.
And to have a robust natural network filled with friends, you've got to be a thoughtful friend. This means remembering people's birthdays and other important occasions. It means giving kudos for their accomplishments. It means sending thank-you notes for referrals or favors you receive.
It also means staying in regular contact through emails, phone calls, and get-togethers. Each week, set a goal to send one friendly unsolicited email to someone who's in your network (or someone you'd like to be in your network). Also, make at least one personal phone call a week to another individual. Finally, at least once a month, arrange to meet someone in your natural network for lunch, cocktails, or just coffee.
If none of this comes naturally to you, make it a priority by putting each obligation on your to-do list.
You Wanna Be Starting Something
A great way to connect with people and, yes, network, is at an event. But rather than attending yet another formal-but-worthless gathering, get people together informally, and for fun.
Start a weekly poker game. Start a book club with coworkers. Start a cooking club. Start a band.
Have a dinner party or a backyard BBQ. Invite your guests to each bring another friend who's not part of your immediate circle.
Arrange a potluck lunch at the office. Initiate a walking group with coworkers during the day. Spearhead a company outing or fundraiser.
Initiating group activities allows you to network organically while having fun.
Oh the Places You'll Go
Joining is as important as initiating. What are your natural interests? Follow them to expand your natural network.
Do you like to golf? Rather than playing with your usual partner, walk on to a course as a single and play with a threesome. You could make three new friends -- and add three new members to your network.
Have you always been interested in pottery? Or learning sign language? Take a course after work. You'll be with a group of like-minded folks from all walks of life. Odds are at least one or two will wind up members of your network.
Joining a gym, a special interest group, or getting involved with local politics are all great ways to meet new people and make new friends.
Become the Ultimate Connector
One of the best ways to be a good friend and great natural networker is to become a connector.
Rather than focusing on how people in your network and new friends can help you, focus on how you can help them. Keep your ears open when someone says they're looking to break into a certain industry or they're seeking someone with specialized knowledge. Who in your network can help? Who in your network would benefit from such an opportunity?
Becoming the ultimate connector may not bear immediate fruit for you and your professional ambitions. But when you need it, you will have a flourishing network to lend you a hand.
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Despite Layoffs and Hiring Freezes, The War for Talent is Not Over
An underlying fact in the American workplace is the shortage of qualified workers available to fill jobs. The principal business challenge of recruiting, retraining and inspiring talent continues, even in a slumping economy - just like in good times - as employees retire, quit, are terminated, find a new job, enroll in school or move away.
With layoffs the remedy for economic ills, it is often mistakenly thought that hiring is linked to economic growth. Statistically; however, economic growth makes up only about 5% of overall hiring actions in the U.S. Turnover is the overwhelming and primary reason for the majority of a company’s need to hire.
When headcount is monitored closely and managers must “made do” with less people, poorer performers are less tolerated and are “performance managed” out. As such, managers look for top performers from outside the company to ensure their teams are able to perform at high levels in challenging times.
At the same time, in a weak economy, top performers seek out opportunities they perceive as recession-proof causing employers to compete against rival employers.
Under a hiring freeze, overall headcount is targeted to remain at an established number. In these circumstances, when an employee leaves, managers still must make “backfill” hires to cover key positions.
After a period of reactionary cutting and freezing, hiring activity will return to a level of normalcy, business as usual. Then, employers will find that that they are lacking talent in a competitive job market—the market for “employed” top performers.
During times like this, employers will be flooded with candidates from which to choose. A nice change…or not? Hiring managers are well advised to proceed with caution as you contemplate hiring from the pool of available “active” candidates—recently available due to layoffs. Likely, these candidates are “first wavers” who in a robust economy “flew under the radar” and now find themselves “redundant” in an economy that requires top talent to produce results. This doesn’t mean all unemployed or job-seeking candidates are bad or mediocre, but for many, it is indeed the fact.
As the numbers of candidates on the market increases it becomes increasingly difficult to “separate the wheat from the chaffe” and choose the people that are of high quality from a group of mixed quality.
Does it make sense then to continue to employ the services of a search firm to find talent for your organization? Consider that a professional executive search firm is in constant contact with candidates and hiring managers across the segments in which they specialize. This “constant contact” is with “passive” candidates who, when facing economic instability, are more likely to entertain a new opportunity if presented by a known, trusted advisor.
The bottom line…great people are hard to find in even the best “employer's market” circumstances, and only great people are a good investment when resources are dear. An investment in a search fee pays dividends when a new employee not only joins your organization, but contributes with the high level of skill, talent and character commonly found with employed, “passive” candidates who “fly under your radar.”
Direct Search Alliance is exclusively a direct recruiting firm, targeting passive candidates (we do not use ads or postings of any kind; we source top talent directly by researching the market and reaching out to working processionals to develop relationships and share connections). We are the Staffing Industry’s best resource, with multidisciplinary depth and breadth across Commercial and Professional segments, to source a top performer for your organization in 2009.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Employment Situation
Employment is one of the primary measures NBER uses in tracking the economy, and it noted that U.S. payrolls peaked last December and have declined every month since.
Historically, temporary and contract employment drops precipitously during recessions. In the last recession, for example, staffing employment began to fall several months before the recession actually began. Over the course of a year and a half, the industry lost 29% of its jobs, according to the quarterly ASA staffing employment and sales survey. In year-to-year comparisons of employment data during that period, there were four consecutive quarters of double-digit rates of decline.
So far in this recession, the pattern has been different. Unlike with previous recessions, staffing employment remained relatively unchanged for 10 months. For example, staffing employment declined only 2.5% from the first quarter through the third quarter of this year, according to the ASA employment and sales survey. And the ASA Staffing Index, which measures changes in temporary and contact employment, had been flat for most of the year, until it started showing sustained weekly declines in late September.
The November employment situation report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics suggests that precipitous declines in employment may now be upon the staffing industry. How long those sharp declines persist will depend in part on how long the recession lasts.
This recession is already longer than the last one. The 2001 recession lasted eight months. The U.S. economy, according to NBER, is currently in the 12th month of contraction. Until now, there had been 10 recessions since World War II, and they lasted an average of 10 months each. The longest recession in that period, in 1981–82, lasted 16 months. Even if this recession becomes the longest since World War II, it is probably more than half over. Many economists predict that the economy will begin to pull out of this downturn by the middle of next year.
Steve Berchem
Staffing Week December 8, 2008
American Staffing Association
Friday, November 28, 2008
Market Conditions Change - Good Advice Doesn't
SPECIAL REPORT
'Greatest economic challenge'
Obama sets sights on economy - vows to confront global financial crisis
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President-elect Barack Obama said Friday that the United States is "facing the greatest economic challenge of our lifetime."
The economy ranked as the top concern among voters. The issue...Jobs.
Layoffs and hiring freezes announced by Companies in the broader economy can ripple throughout the Staffing Industry by causing management to cut back on their costs by "making do" with less staff, and this can make it harder for these companies to maintain market share, fueling the ongoing decline in revenues and profits.
Given the weak labor market, only the most skilled, talented and motivated employees will uncover and leverage opportunities to contribute. The economy may be weak, but it is not without prospects.
Staffing Industry employers might be well served by taking a hard look at the capabilities of their employees and how they are deployed. To preserve a place in the market and prosper for longer term benefit, only the best and brightest should be "on the team," so to speak, in revenue generating assignments.
Tolerating mediocrity is risky. Finding talent is difficult with the unemployment rate increasing. As the numbers of candidates on the market increases it becomes increasingly difficult to “separate the wheat from the chaff” and choose the people that are of high quality from a group of mixed quality.
Does it make sense then to continue to employ the services of a search firm to find talent for your organization? Consider that a professional executive search firm is in constant contact with candidates. This “constant contact” is with “passive” candidates who, when facing economic instability, are more likely to entertain a new opportunity if presented by a known, trusted advisor.
The bottom line, great people are hard to find in even the best “employer's market” circumstances, and only great people are a good investment when resources are dear. An investment in a search fee pays dividends when a new employee not only joins your organization, but contributes with the high level of skill, talent and character commonly found with employed “passive” candidates who “fly under your radar.”
We can help make an investment in finding and hiring talent produce sustaining, material results. Recognizing that in times like these, cost is a factor, we are offering cost-savings options to initiate the search for top talent.
1. Stretch Your Budget with Extended Payment Terms
Have the option to make that critical hire in the near-term and spread payment over time. This "layaway" plan allows you to manage the impact on your budget and begin to realize a return on the investment in talent before making the full investment. Pay in 3-equal payments after the start date: 10-days, 45-days and 90-days.
Extended payment terms do not apply with any other discounts.
2. Take advantage of our Search Sale
Make a hire and receive 25% off the search fee. Even in a challenging economic market, customer-facing, revenue-generating and leadership talent are essential. If you have to make that one great hire, make it at a deep discount.
25% off applies only with standard payment terms of net 10-days.
3. Choose the Best of Both Time & Money
Focus on your core business and let us find you a top performer. Take a 15% discount off the search fee, pay only half the fee 10-days after the start and hold on to the balance for 60-days. Manage your cash and benefit from revenue-producing productivity.
Direct Search Alliance is a Search and Talent Consultancy specializing in the Staffing, Professional Services and Outsourcing Industries. I invite you to visit our website and blog to learn more about our company. Click the links below to download online brochures.
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Barack Obama Becomes the 44th U.S. President
The issue...Jobs.
A total of $100,032,604 was spent to broadcast 52 ads related to the presidential campaign on the issue of jobs from April 3 to Oct. 27, 2008, according to statistics compiled by Campaign Media Analysis Group, which tracks political advertising expenditures.
Layoffs and hiring freezes announced by Companies in the broader economy can ripple throughout the Staffing Industry by causing management to cut back on their costs by "making do" with less staff, and this can make it harder for these companies to maintain market share, fueling the ongoing decline in revenues and profits.
Given the weak labor market, only the most skilled, talented and motivated employees will uncover, discover and leverage opportunities to contribute. The economy may be weak, but it is not without prospects.
Staffing Industry employers might be well served by taking a hard look at the capabilities of their employees and how they are deployed. To preserve a place in the market and prosper for longer term benefit, only the best and brightest should be "on the team," so to speak, in revenue generating assignments. Tolerating mediocrity is risky. Finding talent is difficult with the unemployment rate increasing.
We can help make an investment in finding and hiring talent produce sustaining, material results.
Direct Search Alliance was established by Staffing Industry leaders to provide an alliance between America's best employers and executive, management and professional people already successful in their role and area of specialization.
Our organizational mission is to represent, serve and inspire talented individuals to nurture and propel business performance.
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Selling in a Down Economy
Here are a few thoughts for growing your sales organization in these challenging times.
First, stop accepting excuses for lack of performance… even if they have a basis in truth. It’s always easier for someone to blame the economy, the competition, the lousy sales leads, or even their own company than it is to accept responsibility. The fact is that successful people find a way to succeed regardless of the circumstances. Hardly anybody actually likes to prospect, but hungry successful salespeople who need to generate revenue will become prospecting animals. Are your salespeople making enough calls to generate the business you need? Are they doing everything possible to succeed?
In better times, many salespeople focused on telling prospects about the benefits and advantages of their company’s products or services. They sent lots of proposals and followed up consistently. Business was good. But as soon as the economy slowed, this approach stopped working. The reaction was often to cut price and to add extra value (often by throwing in extra functionality) in an attempt to close deals. Margins eroded and the sales pipeline slowed to a trickle. The very salespeople who seemed like Supermen in the good times now act like kryptonite is in their office.
There are two basic questions that need to be addressed in order to turn around a languishing sales organization.
First: do you have the right people?
Many successful “salespeople” really were more like account managers who farmed their existing client base very effectively. These “farmers” are patient and will say, “Wait until the economy turns around”, or “Nobody is buying right now”. Salespeople who are excellent account managers are not necessarily willing and able to prospect for new business (i.e. become hunters). Find those who have both a strong desire for success and a commitment to do whatever it takes, then get rid of the rest!
The second question is: do your people have the abilities and skills to compete in a tough selling environment?
Many sales organizations, especially those selling technology during the boom times, failed to develop the selling skills of their sales team. Some salespeople were functioning too much as order takers and simply didn’t need to prospect in order to meet their targets. Marketing generated an abundance of leads so the biggest challenge salespeople faced was simply following-up on what was handed to them. Everything was wonderful until the economy took a turn for the worse. Many formerly successful salespeople simply don’t have the skills to compete in this new economy, or they aren’t willing to do what it will take to be successful.
In order to answer the above two questions, consider evaluating your existing organization using some sort of objective assessment methodology. Like any good change process, establishing the current condition is essential in determining an action plan for future change. Knowing strengths and weaknesses of the sales team allows for an action plan to be developed. It is entirely possible that some on the team simply will not be effective in this new economy, so making personnel changes may be the first step. If training is needed, it should be targeted to address those issues that will have the greatest return on investment. For instance, if salespeople are too easily cutting price, then some intensive focus on a good budget step would be prudent. If they send out lots of proposals but don’t close enough, developing their questioning skills and closing strategies would be appropriate.
Additionally, a growing organization should look to systematize the selling process. Determine your best sales practices and then make sure the whole organization consistently follows those practices. What are the best ways to find new leads? How do they get qualified quickly? How are budgets determined? When and how will the decision be made? Answer all these questions BEFORE you spend a fortune on software. Contact management, sales automation, and customer relationship management (CRM) software is abundant and readily available for virtually any size sales organization. Unfortunately, software alone will not fix a weak sales process or a weak sales team.
Lastly, take the time and energy to hire salespeople who not only can sell, but WILL SELL for your company. When looking at those impressive resumes be sure to ask lots of questions about how much prospecting the salesperson did in the past. Many top salespeople inherited accounts and grew an existing base. If that’s what you’re offering them, then they may be a good fit, but don’t expect this former superstar to necessarily cold call and prospect consistently for new business. Again, use good evaluation tools to screen for those attributes that will insure success in your organization. Never hire based strictly upon your “gut”.
Put it all together and you’ll probably find that selling in a down economy really isn’t much different than selling in a good economy. Hire the right people, provide them with great training and tools, and don’t accept excuses. So when the economy picks up again don’t forget the fundamentals. Winners succeed because they are prepared more than others and are committed to be the best. Good Selling!
-- by Kevin Hallenbeck
Sunday, October 12, 2008
Bringing it Back
Confidence comes with action and it is an amalgamation of doing basic "right things" that work together to make business come around.
INTERVIEWS
it seems silly to interview when you have more candidates than jobs, but continue to do so in numbers and dig in a little deeper--where has the candidate interviewed, with whom have they been out on assignment, what employers have contacted them, who do they report to and to whom does their boss report? These are names, names that might be hiring. In times like these when the instance of hiring or needing supplemental staffing is less common, you must increase the number of chances to sell by increasing the number of potential hiring authorities on your prospect list. When you use interviewing as a means to gather market intelligence, you can, at the same time, cross reference the name to the profile of the candidate which can be used to target your marketing efforts on a go forward basis.
Going back to the files and pulling old applications is a target-rich source for names that were passed over when business was too brisk to pay attention to the details.
REFERENCES
Everyone hates to check references - they seem like an annoying obstacle to placing a candidate. But in reality, every professional reference is not only another name, but a person you have a good reason to engage in conversation. Grab up a pile of unchecked references and get busy dialing. Your "connection" ratio will increase multi fold when you are calling about a professional reference. It is an easy transition to turn a call like this to the business of learning about the individual, their organization's needs and prospective opportunities. Go back through old checked references, and voila...more names.
MARKETING CANDIDATES
Once you have a long list of prospective hiring authority names, cross referenced with the kinds of skill classifications that they hire, you can market great candidates on a more macro, but targeted, basis and reach a large number of prospective clients. Do a thorough job writing a profile of the candidate to market and what they can offer an employer, along with a compelling and persuasive overview of your experience and your firm's area of specialization. You will find that if you "hit the bulls eye," you will generate a business opportunity and if you present yourself in the right light, you might generate interest in your services for an alternate opportunity.
The adage - "It is a numbers game" has never been more true. The survivors of this downturn are the individuals and companies who leverage high volumes of data with high levels of activity to touch prospects on a frequency that "makes your own luck" by increasing your chances of being "in the right place and the right time."
Tuesday, September 23, 2008
Talent Surplus – Not!
Does this mean that the scarcity of talent has become less and talent is readily available for the few openings employers have come up in this uncertain economy? To answer this question, first answer these questions:
1. With declining revenues and fewer opportunities on the horizon, is every employee’s contribution even more important to the success of your business and to justifying the role in your organization?
2. If you have made reductions in staff, have you considered performance as one of the deciding factors respecting who to let go, and released the lesser producing employees first?
If you answered yes to either question, take pause as you contemplate hiring from the pool of available “active” candidates. Likely, these candidates are “first wavers” who in a robust economy “flew under the radar” and now find themselves “redundant” in an economy that requires top talent to produce results. This doesn’t mean all unemployed or job-seeking candidates are bad or mediocre, but for many it is indeed the fact.
As the numbers of candidates on the market increases it becomes increasingly difficult to “separate the wheat from the chaffe” and choose the people that are of high quality from a group of mixed quality.
Does it make sense then to continue to employ the services of a search firm to find talent for your organization? Consider that a professional executive search firm is in constant contact with candidates and hiring managers across the segments in which they specialize. This “constant contact” is with “passive” candidates who, when facing economic instability, are more likely to entertain a new opportunity if presented by a known, trusted advisor.
The bottom line…great people are hard to find in even the best “employer's market” circumstances, and only great people are a good investment when resources are dear. An investment in a search fee pays dividends when a new employee not only joins your organization, but contributes with the high level of skill, talent and character commonly found with employed “passive” candidates who “fly under your radar.”
Sunday, September 7, 2008
STAFFING INDUSTRY ANALYSTS BRIEFING
BRIEFING - Economic indicators August 2008
ECRI weekly leading index contracts
Manufacturing and nonmanufacturing indices running flat
Four-week jobless claims up 11.5% from July
Craig Johnson
Event
August was a tough month for economic indicators. Several indicators fell and others posted little change.
Background and analysis
The Economic Cycle Research Institute's weekly leading index contracted in August. The index declined 11.7% in the week ended Aug. 29 versus the year earlier. This is 360 basis points worse than the comparable number of a month ago.
In the U.S. manufacturing sector, economic activity in August was about the same as in July, the Institute for Supply Management reported. The ISM's key purchasing managers' index for manufacturing registered 49.9 in August, nearly unchanged from 50.0 in July. Readings of more than 50 indicate expansion.
"This continues the 2008 trend toward negligible growth or contraction each month, but ultimately results in very little overall change in the sector," said Norbert Ore, chair of the ISM's manufacturing business survey committee.
Economic activity in the U.S. service sector edged up slightly in August after contracting in July, according to the ISM's nonmanufacturing index. The index rose to 50.6 in August from 49.5 in July with readings above 50 indicate expansion.
The employment portion of the nonmanufacturing index fell to a reading of 45.4 in August from 47.1 in the previous month.
In the week ended Aug. 30, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial unemployment claims was 444,000, the U.S. Department of Labor reported. The four-week moving average was 438,000, an increase of 45,000, or 11.5% from the previous month's average 393,000. A Department of Labor program to locate those who may be eligible for jobless benefits may have contributed to the recent rise in these numbers.
Meanwhile, The Conference Board's U.S. leading index of economic indicators fell 0.7% in July, its most recent reading. It now stands at 101.2. The organization said weaknesses among leading indicators continue to be widespread.
However, one bright spot in the economic picture was the upward revision of second-quarter growth in real gross domestic product by the U.S. Department of Commerce on Aug. 28. Real GDP grew at a rate of 3.3% in the second quarter, according to the revision, up from an earlier estimate of only 1.9%.
Staffing Industry Analysts' perspective
Overall, there appeared little good forward-looking news from the economic indicators in August.
Both the manufacturing and non-manufacturing indices are at about 50, meaning flat performance, neither growth nor contraction. Jobless claims rose 11.5% from the previous month, but it's unclear whether the increase is real or simply reflects a new program on the part of the Department of Labor to aggressively seek applications for unemployment claims by locating those unemployed. More troubling is the consistently negative character of two forward-looking indices, the ECRI and the leading index.
Monday, August 25, 2008
It is Not the Market, it is Your Competitors
Profiling Your Competitors
by BNET Editorial
To pull ahead of your business competitors, you need to build a detailed profile of their strengths, weaknesses, and relationships with customers. With that information, you can compare the performance of your business with that of your main competitors, measuring factors that are important to quality of service, and use the comparison as the basis for performance improvement.
Competitor information can be obtained from many different sources, starting with what your competitors say on their own Web sites and in their brochures and annual reports about their capabilities, resources, and plans. You can find information about competitors in the press, trade publications, industry surveys, and on the Internet.
What You Need to Know
Who are my competitors?
Depending on the size of your company and the products or services you offer, you probably already know your competition—from advertising, trade shows, or even your customers. Never assume, however, that you know everything you should know about the competition. Who else is offering what you offer? Many products and services could be classed as non-essential and so customers may be choosing to spend their discretionary budget between two very different market sectors. Are you losing business that way? Is a larger company hurting your business by giving away a competing service as a promotion device? Always be alert to the different ways that others could be taking business away.
Why is competitor intelligence so important?
You need to understand what competitors are offering so you can offer at least as much to customers. Your marketing campaigns or product launches can be affected by what your competitors may be doing at the same time, so learning what you can about their plans is important. You also need to be aware if a competitor is threatening to take away your important accounts. Unless you monitor competitor activity and take appropriate action, your business faces an unknown risk.
Should we use an independent research company, or conduct the research internally?
You can conduct the research internally, provided you or your staff has the time. Much of the source material is in the public domain, so you should be able to obtain it yourself. Don’t overlook the wealth of information you already have in your company or can gain through your own contacts. If you wish to research customer attitudes toward your company versus your competition, you may need to use an independent research organization. Customers may not be completely honest with your own representatives.
How reliable is published competitor information?
Use your critical thinking skills to assess the accuracy and quality of any published information that is used for research. Make sure the information you find is current and that it comes from reliable sources.
What to Do
Identify Your Competitors
Competitor information helps you to identify how you can gain a larger share of the business from your competitors and how to protect the business you have.
Ask yourself:
Quantifying the threat helps you to prioritize your own activities.
Compare Your Key Competitive Factors
Listed below are a number of factors that are important to meeting customer needs. On a scale of 1 to 10 (where 10 is the best in the market), how does your company rate? Consider each factor carefully, then use your results as the basis for a program of performance improvement. Emphasize the things that matter to your customers rather than to your own opinions:
Make Use of Your Sales Force
By talking to customers, your company’s sales representatives can find out about competitors’ direct sales calls, marketing campaigns, special offers, and new developments. They can obtain similar information from retailers or distributors. Crucially, they can get a feel for the customers’ awareness and attitude toward your competitors.
Monitor a Variety of Public Sources
You can learn a great deal about your competitors from their own public information: corporate brochures, annual reports, and exhibitions. Check your competitors’ Web sites frequently for updates on their products, plans, and capabilities as well as any customer case studies or news releases that may be posted on the site.
Monitor trade publications (many are available on the Internet) and the general press for useful information about your competitors. You may have the staff resources to maintain a file of press clippings on your competition, or you may wish to hire a clipping service to gather material for you.
Look for published results of industry surveys, which can provide useful insights into your entire market as well as your competitors.
Analyze Competitors’ Promotional Activities
By monitoring your competitors’ advertising, promotions, exhibition presence, press activities, and Internet information, you can assess their strategies. These are some of the possible scenarios:
Hire a Research Company
If you do not have the internal resources to monitor competitive activity, you can hire an independent research company to perform all the tasks outlined above. You can also ask the company to survey customers to reveal their attitudes toward your company versus your competitors. Customers may be more willing to discuss their attitudes with an independent researcher than they are with someone from your company.
Consider Benchmarking
Once you have assembled detailed information about your competitors, you can benchmark your performance against theirs. Competently done, benchmarking will give you a baseline assessment of your company’s effectiveness in the marketplace and some insight into where competitors may be gaining the advantage over you.
What to Avoid
You Overlook the Obvious Sources
Some competitor intelligence is freely available from the Internet, the press, and other public sources and—most important—from your staff, your customers, and your competitors themselves. Information from these sources can provide a valuable starting point for developing detailed competitor profiles.
You Fail to Make Use of Competitor Information
Competitor information is valuable only if you use it to refine your own strategies or take defensive action to protect your business. Simply gathering information without analysis or action is wasteful.
You Act on Incomplete or Out-of-date Information
Be cautious about acting on competitor intelligence until you have as much complete, accurate, up-to-date information as possible. Published sources can provide only a partial picture, and more strategic information is likely to be confidential. This means that you may make incorrect assumptions in planning your response to competitor action.
Thursday, April 17, 2008
Are You Truly Ready to Sell?
Scientific research (really!) suggests that if you’ve got six key questions answered in your own head, you’re far more likely to make a sale. They’re generic to all sales situations and provide some touch points to know whether you’ve got the leverage to develop the prospect and close the deal.
- How can I help this customer? If you truly believe that you can help the prospect, the prospect will feel obligated to say “yes.” Example: if you’re only calling on truly qualified prospects, and you’ve got an offering that you’re sure can do the job, you know that you can help them.
- What will it cost the customer to not buy? A prospect is more likely to say “yes” if there’s pain and loss connected with saying “no.” If the prospect stands to lose business or opportunity or career points by not buying, you’ve got leverage to make the sale.
- What are the sources of my authority? A prospect is more likely to say “yes” if he or she believes you are knowledgeable and credible. So be certain that you’ve done everything you can to establish yourself as a credible source that can add value to the conversation.
- What similar commitments have already been made? A prospect is more likely to say “yes” if they’ve already made public commitments consistent with purchasing. Example: a prospect that’s made a public commitment to increase revenue will buy offerings that help achieve that.
- Who among the prospect’s peers is already your customer? Prospects believe that saying “yes” entails much less risk if the prospect knows of similar people who have already said “yes.” Make sure that you have reference accounts and sell through referrals whenever possible.
- What is it about this customer that I can truly like and respect? A prospect is more likely to say “yes” to somebody who is likeable, and likeability is a reflection of your own attitude towards the prospect. So find out what’s special about the prospect, and decide to like and respect it.
By Geoffrey James
Friday, March 28, 2008
Do the Math - Why Recruiters Are Worth What They Charge
Companies think very little about paying the often excessive fees charged by their outside accounting and legal firms ... or even to the gaggle of consultants who promise cost-cutting and streamlining miracles in other areas of operations.
Yet, when faced with brain drains, talent deficiencies or the need to replace one employee with a better one, their thoughts too often turn to frugality. This belies and contradicts their stated objectives to "hire the best." Of course recruiting fees can vary from firm to firm but, when they do, you will almost always find that those on the low side are sure to exclude some very key ingredients of the process all of which are vital to providing the indispensable services necessary to satisfy the needs of the employer.
So why are recruiters worth what they charge? Just a few of the often unspoken reasons are:
Expertise
Nobody knows the employment marketplace better than a professional recruiter. . . nobody! In house human resources, no matter how effective (or Internet-savvy), view the marketplace through an imperfect or misrepresentative prism and tunnel vision is a frequent occupational hazard.
Just as physicians are cautioned against treating members of their own families, so too is it folly for an in-house H/R professional to believe that they have an undistorted and unbiased picture of the employment landscape. They are vulnerable to the pressures of internal politics and cultural dimensions which do not hinder the outsider.
Street-smart recruiters already know the neighborhood, including the unlisted addresses so often overlooked by the insiders.
Cast a wider net
A professional fisherman will always have more to show than a weekend angler. Recruiters are in the marketplace day in and day out. They know the unfished coves, reefs and inlets that are unknown to others. The job-hunter bookshelves are filled with lore about the “hidden job market.” The same holds true for professional recruiters who have a detailed roadmap to the hidden talent sources which will never be accessed by newspaper ads, alumni associations, applicant databases, the Internet or any of the other more familiar sources of people.
There are occasional pearls through these sources (and someone inevitably wins the Publisher’s Clearinghouse Sweepstakes too) but you have to shuck an awful lot of smelly oysters to find them. Recruiters only give you oysters proven to contain pearls. Your only job is to determine which pearl is the best. Want to catch what you’re fishing for? Hire a guide!
Cost
There is a misconception among employers that the cost of a hire equals the cost of the ads run or postings on the Internet designed to attract the person hired. Nothing could be further from reality.
Try adding these to the true cost and you’ll see just how cost effective an outside recruiter can be:
Salaries and benefits of the employment/recruiting staffs plus those of the line managers involved in the hiring activity (who are not productive in their normal job pursuits when they’re out recruiting); travel, lodging and entertainment expenses of in-house recruiters; source development costs; overhead expenses including (but not limited to) telephone, office space, postage, PR literature, applicant database maintenance, website costs, reference checking, clerical costs to correspond with the hundreds of unqualified respondents and more.
Unbiased third party input
Contrary to what some believe, recruiters don’t try to put square pegs into round holes. A recruiter’s stock-in-trade is their integrity and their reputation for finding someone better than a company could have found for themselves.
For a mid to senior-level executive, the average recruiter may develop a long list” of a hundred or more possibilities. Each must be called and evaluated against the position specifications as well as the personality “fit” with the company and the people with whom they will ultimately work.
Once this is winnowed down to the “short list” an even more intensive interviewing process begins to narrow the search to a panel of finalists for review by the client...
It is highly unlikely that a professional recruiter will be plowing new ground with your opening.
They deal within spheres of influence far more familiar with your needs than any internal recruiter and, more often than not, view the finalists as people who are competent to solve client problems rather than just fill an open slot in the organizational chart.
Because they want to do business with you again and again, they are looking for (and challenging you to excellence by hiring) the “truly exceptional” rather than the “just satisfactory” so often settled for by in-house hirers.
Confidentiality
Advertising or otherwise publicly proclaiming an opening, aside from its cost and demonstrated ineffectiveness for sensitive senior level openings, often creates anxiety and apprehension among the advertiser’s current employees who wonder why they aren’t being considered or worry about newcomer transition problems. Just as often it alerts competitors to a current weakness or void within the company.
Speed
The recruiting process is always faster through a search professional who is continually tapped into the talent marketplace than one having to start the process from scratch,. For every day that a key opening remains unfilled, a company’s other employees must grudgingly do double duty. And this doesn’t factor in the profit opportunities or competitive advantages lost to a company because a position remains unfilled or is done on a part-time basis by others less qualified.
Post-Hire Downtime - Not only is speed an essential part of the professional recruiter’s process, the ability to locate a person who can immediately “hit the ground running” with a minimum of “ramp-up time” saves time after the hire. All too often, a hire selected through less effective sources offering a smaller talent pool requires several months of expensive training and orientation.
Reality
Professional recruiters often recognize and have a duty to inform clients that they may be mistaken as to the type of person sought, the salary required to attract them or the possibilities that the solution might just lie in areas outside the traditional target industries.., something an internal recruiter is politically disinclined to do. Too many hirers fail to understand that a professional recruiter’s primary function is not necessary to fill a slot but to provide the right candidate to solve a problem.
Negotiation
As a buffer and informed intermediary, the professional recruiter is better able to blend the needs and wants of both parties to arrive at a mutually beneficial arrangement without the polarizing roadblocks which too frequently materialize in face-to-face dealings, especially in this “show me the money” economy.
Prioritizing company resources
It is often amazing to see how much of a company’s revenues are squandered on non-productive perks while penny-pinching on what is every company’s lifeblood. . . talent acquisition. Enlightened executives learned long ago that the fee paid to a recruiter is a shrewd strategic investment, not an extraneous expense.
Do the Math
Here is a good example:If your company has A territory vacant for 2 months and this territory produces 1.2 Million dollars per year, your company has lost $200,000 during the time the position has been vacant
Ex. $1,200,000/12 months = $100,000 per month. If the territory is open for 2-months you have lost $200,000!
So, the investment that you would make to a recruiter for quickly finding top qualified individuals is far, far less compared to allowing the territory to remain open. It becomes even more apparent when you factor in the amount of time, energy and money spent on all the in house efforts.
Content thanks to Porter Group, Inc.
Monday, January 28, 2008
How Much Does it Really Cost to Hire - or not to Hire?
In a recent article in 'The Interbiznet Bugler', it is stated that the Saratoga Institute, often seen as the ultimate source of HR thinking, typically describes "cost per hire" as the sum of administrative costs and expenses, and Infomart-USA, a hiring practices auditing company, estimates the national average at about $4,400. They consider the elements of cost per hire to be the following:
- Advertising
- Agency fees
- Employment fairs
- Employment office salary expense
- Employment office facility expense
- Estimate of time spent in training
- Recruiter travel expense
- Internal recruiter expense
- Internal recruiter labor expense
- Referral Bonus
- Recruiting & Training expense
- Uniforms
The means used to calculate the administrative cost per hire is deeply understated. So what is the real cost per hire - or more importantly, per not hiring?
Opportunity Costs
The cost of a hire is the money lost because the hire wasn't made. Well recognized in MBA programs and broadly understood throughout the rest of the organization, the simple concept is "opportunity costs."
At its most basic, the opportunity cost associated with a particular hire is the productive revenue lost because the hire wasn't made. Here's an easy way to get your arms around the real cost per hire in your organization.
- Take the annual sales of your company (or division) and divide it by the number of employees. This is the annual revenue per employee.
- Divide that number by 250 to get the daily revenue per employee.
- Multiply daily revenue per employee by the number of days it takes to hire an employee.
- If you want, add the dollars spent by the Recruiting Department (it's a minor fraction).
This is the real cost per hire. Generally it's 5 to 10 times the administrative costs.
Using an outside recruiter to fast-track hiring of sales talent is good business as it costs far less than not hiring and is an investment in your organization’s growth. When economic times are challenging, sales-focused employees are the resource best leveraged to protect market share—in a shrinking market, taking share away from your competitors is priority one, superseding cost containment measures. Fielding sales talent is an initial success that lays the groundwork for achieving growth objectives. Tapping into a network of industry sales professionals puts growth-minded managers on the offensive.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
It's January 2, 2008 - Where is Your Sales Talent?
Considering the Staffing industry market is near to $90B, I ask..."Isn't it really about how we approach the marketplace"? When an industry is growing it is easy to increase your business, just jump on the economic escalator and focus on delivery. When the market is retreating it is not so easy, but with a multi-billion market at hand, it should be with the right strategy and tactics.
Many staffing firms leveraged the "escalator effect" to boost profits by leaving revenue-generating field positions open for extended periods or not investing in sales talent in all territories to reduce the cost base against market-driven revenue increases. This works in the economy that is now in our rear view mirror; however, in 2008 the pleasant escalator ride will fast become more like an unpleasant battleground for the firms caught with gaping revenue-generating vacancies.
The battle will be over market "share" and the strategy for 2008 will center on influencing hiring managers, human resources and procurement to change providers - in other words, the growth leaders of 2008 will take away business from their competitors.
The tactics are simple, yet difficult for most companies to execute. To win, the participants must have on the field a well-trained, prepared, and talented sales force before their competitors. To do so, companies must step back from cost management at the expense of deploying a business development workforce. With demand declining, cost containment on the personnel expense line will neither offset the revenue downturns, nor spur increases that have vaporized in the changing economy.
Investment in revenue-generating people is risky in an organization where headcount management, productivity per headcount metrics, compliance and delivery solutions has dominated profit-making strategies. But, as I will explore further in the New Year, there are some leverage points to mitigating the risk of playing to win in 2008:
The greatest challenge to overcome in a retreating economy is not whether a company can grow against prior-year economic-driven benchmarks (which it can). The greater challenge is can industry leaders operationally turnaround their laissez-faire attitude regarding fielding sales talent and make the necessary shifts to strengthen their company’s sales culture, sales-support platform and scope of sales “coverage” across their market footprint before it is too late for cost reductions to protect earnings and shareholder value.
Sunday, December 9, 2007
How to Work With Contingency Recruiters
Sell it; don’t just tell it: When you are discussing your hiring needs with a good recruiter, don’t forget that you need to sell them on you, your company, and your hiring process. Be sure to stress your urgency level, the speed and efficiency of your hiring process, and the selling points as to why candidates they present will want to work at your company. Provide recruiters with electronic copies of internal job descriptions, incentive program documents and benefits summaries--these are selling tools for recruiters.
Choose recruiters based on ability and experience rather than solely on cost: Otherwise, you may end up working with a lower echelon recruiter. Recruiters who charge rock-bottom fees may be good for some job orders, but if you are highly selective or have difficult positions to fill, you might have to ‘sweeten the pot’ to make it more appealing. Top performing recruiters don’t work for bargain basement fees and they have little incentive to work on a job order when the payment terms are not advantageous or adhered to.
Responsiveness and feedback are essential: The ‘A’ list recruiters require feedback from you for candidates that are off the mark, and not just for the candidates that are the right fit. Failure to give feedback on submittals is the number one reason that top contingency recruiters stop working on behalf of any given client. These recruiters need to know how far off target they are in order to better hone their aim. Be sure your feedback is detailed and specific. If you’ve given this level of feedback repeatedly and you still aren’t getting candidates that are a fit, it’s time to evaluate whether you are truly working with an ‘A’ list recruiter, or if there is some other problem or issue in your expectations or hiring process.
Follow-up with your best recruiters on a regular basis: You need not wait until they send you a candidate for you to contact them. In fact, a proactive call from you to your top recruiters asking what you can do to help them is one of your strongest tools to keep outside recruiters motivated to work for you, even if they aren’t making placements yet. Your call to them shows that you have a sense of urgency and that you value their time and effort. In this call, you can give examples of candidates you’ve interviewed, or any other information that will help them hone-in on the ideal candidate.
The most important lesson is that there are great recruiters in the market. Your goal is to proactively locate them through any means necessary, sell them on why they should work for you, and continue to engage with them. And, throughout your candidate search, make sure to keep them in the loop on any changes and updates, as well as to subtly ‘sell’ them on working your job orders.
Hiring in all niche markets is getting tougher in this tightening candidate market. Make sure your company has the reputation of being good to work with in the outside recruiter community so you can attract and retain the best third-party, or contingency recruiters, to help you meet all your hiring needs with the best talent in the market.
Saturday, November 10, 2007
Recruiting Tidbits from Recruiting Veterans
Read on, it might be interesting. Remember, I'm not telling you how to recruit — just sharing a few ideas that work.
It's in the Numbers
And whether you're an internal, external, or contract recruiter, knowing the activity metrics it takes to be successful and measuring daily is very important.
Daily measurement of quality performance metrics leads to knowledge and success. Whether recruiting for a company or agency, understanding your activity will help you understand your business in sophisticated and strategic ways. Agree on activity to be measured and then put a process in place to understand daily performance. It works.
I Need Your Help
If you have not asked a source, prospect, candidate or client for help recently, get back to it. If you're stuck, or you're not working at the pace you're accustomed to, try asking for help. A door to an incredible and successful adventure may be opened.
It's All About Relationships
Great relationships can be built inside companies or out. It depends on you and your desire to do it. Think about your market, your internal hiring customers. Do they like your results? Do they like you? Have you gone out of your way to help them recently? Don't forget--get results, but be a friend.
What About You?
There are more than just these few recruiting tidbits that ensure one's success. When you ask the best how they characterize their success, common themes emerge:
All of these are important. I believe we all agree that if you measure your activity, ask questions, show no fear, and work to build relationships, you will create a foundation of recruitment success. It's important we understand, remember, and practice these recruitment skills, especially as we take the convergence of recruitment process and technology to the next level.
Thanks for selected excerpts from Some Recruiting Tidbits from Recruiting Veterans by Hank Stringer